Observation: The First Step in the Scientific Method

To observe means to look at something and to notice the details. When scientists observe things they often ask questions.
Scientists then seek to answer their questions. These observations are the initial step in the scientific method.

Observations are also called data. There are two types of data.

- Qualitative data are descriptions that do not have numbers.

Example: The large black bird, with the yellow bill, held its wings out in the afternoon sunlight.

- Quantitative data are obtained by measuring and have numbers. Scientists use instruments (tools) to obtain numbers based data.

The double crested cormorant weighed 2200 grams with a wing span of 100 centimeters. It ate 6 fish from 0900 to 1100 GMT is quantitative data.

Practice making observations:

On a recent trip to the garden store, a plant lover saw this and took a photo.

Click on the photo for a closer view. Use the Back Button of your browser to return to this web page.

1. Write your observations.

Imagine - If you were standing there, looking at the plant:

What tools (instruments) would help you to be a better observer?

What tools (instruments) would you use to make measurements?

 

2. Fire up your imagination or curiosity. Write at least two hypothesis about this stuff.

3. TAI (Think About It) Which fields of science would be interested in studying this stuff?

Resources:

About Units of Measurement - IB Biology | Observing Biology how to's | The Scientific Process

Observation - Science Skills Builders

Steps of the Scientific Method - Science Buddies | Learn about the Scientific Method Activity

"The tree which moves some to tears of joy is in the eyes of others only a green thing that stands in the way.
Some see nature all ridicule and deformity . . . and some scarce see nature at all.
But to the eyes of the man of imagination, nature is imagination itself." William Blake

Posted by Cynthia J. O'Hora 10/2008, released for noncommercial use by nonprofit organizations

Aligned with Pennsylvania Academic Standards Science & Technology, Reading Writing, Careers | Rubric Templates at Bernie Dodge site

Pennsylvania Academic Standards - The Nature of Science
Processes, Procedures and Tools of Scientific Investigations
• Apply knowledge of scientific investigation or technological design in different contexts to make inferences to solve problems.
• Use evidence, observations, or a variety of scales (e.g., time, mass, distance, volume, temperature) to describe relationships.

Save a tree - use a Digital Answer Format - Highlight the text. Copy it. Paste it in a word processing document. Save the document in your folder. Answer on the word processing document in an easily read, contrasting color (Not yellow ) or font. Avoid fancy fonts like: Symbols, Techno, fonts). Save frequently as you work. I have never liked losing my work. You will not like it either. Be sure to enter your name & the date at the top of the document. Submit via email attachment or class dropbox. Bad things happen: Save a copy of the response document for your records.

Proof your responses. It is funny how speling errors and typeos sneak in to the bets work. Make your own printer paper answer sheet

National Science Education Standards:
CONTENT STANDARD G: As a result of activities in grades 9-12, all students should develop understanding of

NATURE OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
Scientific explanations must meet certain criteria. First and foremost, they must be consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and must make accurate predictions, when appropriate, about systems being studied. They should also be logical, respect the rules of evidence, be open to criticism, report methods and procedures, and make knowledge public. Explanations on how the natural world changes based on myths, personal beliefs, religious values, mystical inspiration, superstition, or authority may be personally useful and socially relevant, but they are not scientific.

Because all scientific ideas depend on experimental and observational confirmation, all scientific knowledge is, in principle, subject to change as new evidence becomes available. The core ideas of science such as the conservation of energy or the laws of motion have been subjected to a wide variety of confirmations and are therefore unlikely to change in the areas in which they have been tested. In areas where data or understanding are incomplete, such as the details of human evolution or questions surrounding global warming, new data may well lead to changes in current ideas or resolve current conflicts. In situations where information is still fragmentary, it is normal for scientific ideas to be incomplete, but this is also where the opportunity for making advances may be greatest.